Reffem

The Depth of a Phone Call.
The Speed of AI.

Reffem is the world's first AI recruiter that automatically takes calls from, interviews, and analyzes job references. Stop playing phone tag and get deeper insights than a text survey can ever provide.

First 3 AI Interviews Free. No Credit Card Required.

The AI Interviewer

Not text-to-speech. Reffem provides cutting-edge, intelligent, automated reference interviews.

Conversational Voice Agent

An expert interviewer, available 24/7.

Reffem accepts calls from the references at the time that suits them—even nights and weekends. Thanks to advances in voice AI, it speaks naturally, builds rapport, and ensures professional, unbiased questioning every time.

Context-Aware Questions

Tailored to every candidate and role.

Upload a resume and job description, and Reffem generates interview questions specific to each role—from executives and sales managers to nurses, warehouse leads, and software engineers. Our AI digs deeper when answers are vague, ensuring you get the full picture.

AI-Powered Insights

Read between the lines.

Reffem analyzes every response to detect hesitation, enthusiasm, and red flags. Get executive summaries, skill assessments, and key quotes automatically extracted from each interview.

"...he was usually on time..."
Detected Hesitation (40%)

Completely Natural Sounding AI

Listen to a reference interview by Reffem. Notice how the AI asks intelligent follow-up questions, adapts to responses, and maintains a professional yet conversational tone.

Sample Reference Interview

Example: Senior Software Engineer

0:43 / 0:00

Starting at 0:44 to highlight key moments.

Reffem AI0:00

Good afternoon, Avery. Thank you so much for taking the time to speak with me today. As you know, we're speaking about Michael, who's being considered for a senior software engineer role here. We really appreciate you sharing your insights.

Reference0:11

Of course, Jordan. Happy to help. Michael reported directly to me for three years, right up until I moved to a different department last quarter.

Reffem AI0:18

That's perfect. Well, to start then, how would you describe Michael's work ethic and his reliability?

Reference0:24

Michael was exceptionally reliable, especially when we were up against a really high stakes deadline. I remember a critical API migration project last year. The deadline was a hard two weeks. And Michael consistently stayed late without anyone asking just to make sure all the integration points were perfect. That was typical of him.

Reffem AI0:43

That's great context. So could you provide some specific examples of Michael's key strengths and maybe just importantly some areas for development you noticed?

Reference0:52

His key strength is definitely his technical depth, specifically in backend system architecture, database optimization—just brilliant. Where he had some room for development was sometimes prioritizing technical purity over practical speed.

Reffem AI1:07

Could you elaborate on that? I mean, if he's optimizing something, why is that a development area?

Reference1:12

Sure. There was one time Michael spent three full days optimizing a single database query. And technically, the code was beautiful. It was perfect. But that query only ran once a month for a report. A quick 30-minute fix would have been fine, and it would have freed him up for customer-facing features that were urgent. It just showed a little bit of a disconnect from the immediate business needs.

Reffem AI1:35

I see. That really helps frame his decision-making. OK, how did Michael handle challenging situations or, say, conflicts within the team?

Reference1:44

Michael tends to avoid interpersonal friction. He's not a confrontational person. When we had a big disagreement with the design team over a new feature, Michael actually stepped in as a sort of technical mediator. Instead of arguing, he just compiled all this detailed documentation that showed, with data, the complexity of what they were asking for. He used data to resolve the conflict.

Reffem AI2:04

Did that require him to step out of his comfort zone a bit to manage personalities?

Reference2:08

It did, yeah. He's not naturally outspoken, but he saw that an objective voice was needed. And the document itself kind of diffused the whole situation so the teams could focus on a solution instead of being frustrated with each other.

Reffem AI2:24

Right. OK, next. Did Michael effectively meet deadlines and manage his workload?

Reference2:29

For big complex projects, absolutely. Like that API migration I mentioned, he was fantastic. But for the smaller, more routine maintenance tickets, the less exciting stuff, he sometimes needed a nudge to close those out after a big project was done.

Reffem AI2:42

So he needed a little more accountability for the more mundane tasks.

Reference2:45

A little bit, yeah.

Reffem AI2:47

Got it. And how well did Michael collaborate and communicate with his teammates?

Reference2:50

Within the engineering team, collaboration was really strong. He's great at asynchronous communication—detailed code comments, pull request reviews, very proactive on Slack. He was a bit less vocal in big cross-departmental meetings, tended to only speak up when asked directly.

Reffem AI3:08

OK. And can you comment on Michael's ability to adapt to change? A sudden shift in project scope, for example.

Reference3:15

Oh, technically, he adapted incredibly well. When our whole infrastructure pivoted from one cloud provider to another, Michael immediately took the lead on learning the new tool set. He didn't even have to be asked. He just embraces technical change.

Reffem AI3:28

What ways did Michael demonstrate leadership skills or take initiative on your team?

Reference3:33

Michael's initiative was very focused on technical growth. He noticed that our new hires were taking a long time to get up to speed. So completely on his own, he designed and documented a full onboarding curriculum for junior engineers.

Reffem AI3:45

Wow.

Reference3:45

And that curriculum, I mean, it significantly cut down the time it took for new people to become productive.

Reffem AI3:51

That's a very concrete example of initiative. Did Michael display strong problem solving and critical thinking skills?

Reference3:58

Absolutely. When a mission critical service failed last spring—I mean, immediate customer impact—Michael was the one who diagnosed it. He figured out it wasn't our code, but a really obscure dependency issue from an external update. He isolated the fix and had us back online in under an hour. He's a true troubleshooter.

Reffem AI4:16

That shows incredible thinking under pressure. OK, just a couple more. How did Michael handle feedback and constructive criticism?

Reference4:23

Very professionally. After we talked about him being more proactive in those cross-functional meetings, he immediately scheduled weekly syncs with the product managers to make sure his work had visibility. He wasn't defensive at all. He just wanted to fix it.

Reffem AI4:37

Avery, thank you. These examples are incredibly helpful. So the ultimate question. Given the opportunity, knowing this role is very technical and back-end focused, would you rehire Michael?

Reference4:47

Yes. I would absolutely rehire Michael for a role that plays to his technical depth and his problem-solving skills. I would just also make sure that role had a project manager to help with prioritizing some of those smaller routine tasks.

Press play to follow along with the transcript.

How It Works

1

Invite

Takes seconds

Enter the candidate's details and Reffem invites candidates to submit their references. Reffem automatically follows up with references.

2

Interview

Available 24/7

References call in at their convenience—nights and weekends included. The Reffem AI conducts the interview using your specific competency questions.

3

Insight

Ready in ~1 minute

You receive a recording, a full transcript, and an AI-generated Executive Report highlighting risks and strengths.

The "Text Survey" Trap

  • Competitors just send email forms.
  • References give short, generic one-word answers to finish quickly.
  • You miss the tone, hesitation, and nuance of a real conversation.

The Reffem Advantage

  • Real Interviews: Our AI conducts a 5-10 minute verbal interview.
  • Adaptive Questioning: If a reference gives a vague answer, Reffem asks for an example.
  • Smart Analysis: We transcribe the call and flag hesitation or enthusiasm.
  • Identity Verification: We verify each reference's identity against their phone number to prevent fraud.

See What You'll Get

Comprehensive reports with executive summaries, skill assessments, key quotes, and full transcripts.

Michael Chen

Former Manager at DataFlow Solutions

5/5.0
Strongly Recommend

Executive Summary

Sarah Johnson is an exceptional product leader who combines strategic vision with operational excellence. During her two years at DataFlow Solutions, she led a consumer product team that achieved outstanding results, including a 34% increase in user retention. Her former manager, Michael Chen, highlights her rare ability to balance big-picture thinking with hands-on execution, exceptional stakeholder management skills, and strong mentorship capabilities. Sarah created a high-performing team culture with the lowest attrition rate in the organization. While she could continue developing her delegation skills, this is a minor area for growth compared to her significant strengths. Sarah receives the highest possible recommendation.

Key Strengths

Strategic Product Vision
Stakeholder Management
Data-Driven Decision Making
Team Leadership & Mentorship
Execution Excellence

Skills Assessment

Soft Skills
Leadership
Communication
Strategic Thinking
Technical Skills
Product Strategy
User Research
Analytics & Metrics

Key Quotes

"I would hire Sarah again in a heartbeat. She's one of the best product leaders I've worked with in my 15-year career."
"She has this rare combination of strategic thinking and hands-on execution. She can develop a compelling product vision and then roll up her sleeves to make it happen."
1:234:05

Audio playback available in full reports

Over 50,000 interview minutes logged this year.

"We used to send email surveys, but the answers were useless. With Reffem, we actually hear the reference's voice. We avoided a major bad hire because Reffem probed on a 'red flag' answer."

— Director of Talent, WinTech

Simple, Transparent Pricing

Choose your plan to get started with AI-powered reference checking. You can change your plan anytime.

Free

$0/month

3 call credits

  • AI-powered reference calls
  • Basic reports
  • Email support

Starter

$179/month

25 reference calls

$7 per overage

  • AI-powered reference calls
  • Detailed reports
  • Email support
Most Popular

Professional

$499/month

125 reference calls

$5 per overage

  • Everything in Starter
  • Priority support
  • ATS integrations (Coming Soon)

Business

$899/month

300 reference calls

$3 per overage

  • Everything in Professional
  • Optional White Labeling
  • Advanced analytics

Enterprise

Contact Us

Unlimited reference calls

  • Everything in Business
  • Enterprise Support
  • Dedicated account manager

All plans include AI-powered reference calls, transcripts, and reports. Upgrade anytime to get more calls and features.

Frequently Asked Questions

See Reffem in Action

Schedule a personalized demo and discover how Reffem can transform your hiring process. Our team will walk you through the platform and answer all of your questions.

Ready to Transform Your Reference Checking?

Join companies using AI to make smarter, faster hiring decisions.